Briantist:Read this! You know you want to... is out! http://t.co/iZRMlAut0g â–¸ Top stories today via @KJHrannarsson Briantist:BBC - Blogs - Internet blog - Whats on BBC Red Button - May 18-25 http://t.co/X5ku3yztim viperdudeuk:@Briantist and OFCOM respond by proposing obfuscation. Briantist:BBC News - Phone cost confusion putting off callers Ofcom says http://t.co/jKL02D70Io Briantist:Ofcom to crack down on sloppy subtitles - Media - guardiancouk http://t.co/AzXWCRKy1M Briantist:Read this! You know you want to... is out! http://t.co/iZRMlAut0g â–¸ Top stories today via @SearchEngines24 Briantist:The quality of live subtitling Improving the viewer experience http://t.co/roGPNX2lt1 Briantist:Media Talk podcast Nick Grimshaw and the missing million http://t.co/YDubtlygDu Briantist:Media Talk podcast Nick Grimshaw and the missing million http://t.co/KVZCG44e7m Briantist:From the archive: Want to better understand the current TV faults? See the all new UK Free TV page The "All tr... http://t.co/SE4Nczffon
BBC Freedom Of Information - transmitter radiation patterns
The BBC have released to me under a FoI request the transmitter radiation patterns
Published on by Brian Butterworth on UK Free TV It has always been a great disappointment that the full radiation patterns for transmitters are not published by the transmitter companies.
A few weeks ago, I used the Freedom of Information Act to request this information from the BBC.
And, very kindly, they have provided it all!
This will mean, when I have processed the data, to be able to provide improved prediction maps and other facilities on the site.
I'll be posting more about what this data means in the next week. However, if you want to look at the raw information yourself, it can be downloaded here as a ZIP file (10.2MB).
Post-switchover data
There is one file for each multiplex on each transmitter (3713 patterns in total), although not
all sites are guaranteed to be built, and other sites might be required to be added later. Note
that the two-digit number in the file name is the frequencychannel.
The attached spreadsheet is an index which lists each transmitter, multiplex, and filename.
The antenna pattern files all end in a .plt file extension, but these are all plain text files that can
be read by any text editor. However, they are in unix format, not MSDOS format, so they
use only line feed instead of line feed and carriage return at the end of each line. If your text
editor does not support this, there are plenty of free unix-to-MSDOS conversion utilities that
you can download.
There are two types of PLT files 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional.
The 2-dimensional patterns contain a line near the start that says, for example,
"HORIZONTAL 360" meaning that this file contains a horizontal radiation pattern (ie a
normal top-down view of the antenna pattern not to be confused with the antenna
polarisation) with 360 measurement points. This is followed by 360 measurements (1 degree
apart) in dB below maximum erp. Not all 2D files have a 1 degree resolution some may be
5 degrees or 10 degrees.
The 3-dimensional patterns (recognisable by their much larger file size) are more complex.
These contain a line for example like "PATTERN 360 101". This means the antenna pattern
has 360 horizontal measurements around (1 degree resolution) and for each of those there
are 101 sets of results at different angles of elevation from the horizontal (ie. the vertical
radiation pattern at each of the 360 degrees). The next line of the file lists those 101 angles
which might typically run from -5 degrees (above the horizontal) to +20 degrees (below the horizontal) in 0.25 degree steps. For each of these 360 x 101 points is a measurement in dB
below maximum erp. The number of horizontal points is not always 360 (but mostly is) and
may be 5 degree or 10 degree resolution instead, and the number of vertical elevations
recorded will vary a lot, and will not always be at the same resolution (eg. another possibility
might be 76 different elevations between 0 and 15 degrees below the horizontal in 0.2 degree
steps). The steps are not guaranteed to be evenly spaced in all cases, so you must read the
top line of elevation angles in order to interpret the data correctly.
A small number of antennas (27) do not yet have a plt file assigned to them. For these, in the
spreadsheet, there is a column which gives a simple 10 degree resolution pattern as a 72
character string (36 two-digit values for the angles between 0 and 350 degrees).
Pre-switchover data
This is similar to the above (520 patterns in total) except that the antenna pattern files all end
in a .rpd file extension.
Within the RPD file is information about the transmitter name and frequency channel, and the
filename consists of the transmitter number (5 digits) followed by the 2 digit frequency
channel. The included spreadsheet includes a transmitter number to name conversion for
these files.
The format of the antenna pattern data is similar to the PLT files, giving the number of points
around the pattern, and the number of elevations for which patterns exist, and the range of
those elevations. Eg 72 11 0.00-10.00 means 72 points around (5 degree resolution, starting
at zero degrees), and 11 elevations between 0 and 10 degrees (below horizontal), ie 1 degree
apart. Unlike PLT files, the RPD elevation angles are always equally spaced.
This looks promising! But I do not find my locals in the plt file listings : 13800, 13112 or 13100 (Huntshaw, Ilfracombe or Caradon Hill). Am I mis-reading something???
Looks like "they have provided it all" apart from the missing files - I can't find the .plt files for Beacon Hill and some of its relays (e.g. Brixham, Clennon Valley, Torquay Town). Any idea where these have gone?
Jim F: There may be some sections that have been redacted. I'm just going to go though all the data and if there is anything missing I will get back onto them.
Hi Jordy - yes that's me; couldn't resist the opportunity of seeing the radiation patterns. Well done to Brian for getting the info thus far, thanks. Fingers crossed for the rest.
The three .plt files for the Totnesrelay (prefix 13611) all have identical data.
Analysis of this HRP data gives identical results to my "old" data (last updated 1987). For information, the data at each angle is dB of loss - to display correctly on an Excel radar chart, put a "-" sign in front of the value (i.e. 20 would become -20 (dB) which would be in the centre of the chart).
0 degrees represents North.
The "old" data only gave data at 10 degree steps. Interpolating these data points (by 1/10th) between two adjacent values, gives precisely the same data as the .plt file. It appears that the .plt file content has been created by this method (i.e. .plt file is unneccessarily large).
I wonder what's been redacted?
Jim F: Thanks. I guess it might be worth having an ask of Ofcom for the missing ones. They are covered by FoI, whereas ITV plc, Arqiva and SDN are not!
Brian: The documentation I have for the "old" data just specifies North - it doesn't qualify whether this is magnetic, grid or true. I'd guess it means true North, but that's just a guess.
Definitely worth asking both the BBC and Ofcom for the missing information - it would also be useful to know the vintage of the data (i.e. have they supplied you with intentionally old data?).
Jim F: The data is current, according to the letter I was sent. Hopefully I will have time to go though everything today and then I can make a very specific request of Ofcom for the missing data.
In-Use Radiation Patterns : Show the reductions in dB, in 10° steps in azimuth, starting with 0 and ending with 350, for each polarisation plane in the case of VHF (normalised to the In-Use ERP/HP or In-Use ERP/VP respectively).
So the BBC DTT ones will be the same? ie, reductions?
If you publish the full content of the BBC response letter it explains why some sites have had to be redacted. Note that it was Ofcom that required some sites to be redacted, so asking them won't reveal data for the other sites I'm afraid.
Andy Fraser: I'm just working doing the imports of the data at the moment. I'm going to post the letter and everything when I've got a way of displaying the data.
There data is in lots of different formats, making the job a little more complicated.
Generated by my own C# program. One line per unique plot for the same transmitter - by site ID, so where there is a VP and an HP plot for the same transmitter, they're separate images.
I haven't done anything with the beam tilt data. For the 3D patterns I've simply used the angle with the least attenuation.
Brian, I think you did really well getting this info, and I think Mike`s done a really good job on the radiation pattern graphics.
It`s such a pity that the main TXs aren`t included. However I was talking to a contact at Ofcom just the other day and he couldn`t really think of any reason for their censorship. He speculated that the reason for their omission could have been that the international interference avoidance agreements may not have been made then, but they have been now. Thus they may now be available if you asked again. Do you think there`s any chance you could do anything on it ?
Justin Smith
Andy Fraser: It was redacted at the time of the request, they don't provide the information for you later, so I will have to make another request for it.
I have now also uploaded the 25 pre-switchover patterns. Three of these are odd:
There were data files for 9 channels at Hemel Hempstead and 12 channels at Malvern. The extra channels were used before the equalization programme in 2000! While Hemel still uses three of the same channels, the newer plots have a comment "New 8 lambda antenna carrying all DTT" so I'm assuming the old plots for those channels were overwritten, and have only plotted the three that fell out of use.
The third oddity is that there is a pattern for Sheffield on C35. As far as I can tell, Sheffield has never broadcast anything on C35. I've uploaded it anyway.
I have not mapped channel to multiplex on these plots as this data set doesn't include it.
Brian, looking back at this he thread, did the BBC's original response ever get published? "Steve at BBC" suggested that their response explained the reason for the redactions?
Brian, are you up for doing anything to get the other radiation patterns off the BBC ?
I spoke to Ofcom again this morning and theyt repeated that they cannot think of any reason why the BBC should not release some of the transmitter patterns.
If, understandably, you`ve lost enthusiasm for it, I could have a go, but could you get in touch with me and tell me how to go about it ?
Justin Smith