The "secret" Ofcom plan for Freeview HDTV: DVB-T2

Ofcom has a plan for bringing HDTV to 98.5% of the UK: Reduce, Reorganising and T2

Ofcom has a plan for bringing HDTV to 98.5% of the UK: Reduce,
Published on 21st October 2007 at 17:35 by Brian Butterworth
Ofcom has a plan (found here) for bringing HDTV to 98.5% of the UK. It involves:
  • Reducing the bit-rate of current SD services with associated picture quality degradation
  • Reorganising channels between the Multiplexes, for example by moving some non-PSB services to the commercial Multiplexes
  • Switching transmitters from DVB-T to DVB-T2 Phase 1

The current situation

In the UK, digital television though an aerial is provided using six transmission multiplexes that broadcast using a standard called DVB-T. Two of these multiplexes operate in one mode - 64QAM and the other four in 16QAM mode. The former delivers more data - 24Mb/s compared to 16Mb/s, but is more susceptible to interference. The total capacity is 120Mb/s for all six:



As each region switches over, the multiplexes will be all switched to 64QAM mode - as the transmission power can be increased to compensate. This creates 24Mb/s of additional capacity:



Ofcom propose that the non-PSB channels on multiplex PSB2 be moved to the capacity created on the COM2 and COM3 multiplex. These can include ITV2, 3 & 4, E4, More 4. This will result in this configuration:



Now Ofcom propose that the BBC's capacity on PSB3 be moved to PSB2, like this:



Now Ofcom reclaims 7Mb/s from the BBC, making this allocation:



To provide universal coverage for five (or S4C or TeleG), some capacity is reallocated to PSB2 from COM1. This results in:



Now, as COM3 is now clear, it is repurposed for DVB-T2 transmission:



DVB-T2 is a new standard that uses 256QAM transmission mode combined with a new error correction protocol which delivers 30Mb/s, or about 25% more than 64QAM mode.

Also, all the transmissions will be in MPEG-4 (part 10) which offers better compression for standard resolution channels as well as high definition.

So, from 2009 the plan is:



And by 2017 the rest of the multiplexes have transferred to DVB-T2



Is this a good plan?

This plan will deliver three at launch rising to four full-time HDTV services to every home in the country as switchover happens, with reasonable bandwidth for each service.

However, this will be at the cost to those 8.5% of the population of some channels, such as ITV3, 4, More4 and E4 which they may have been expecting after switchover. DVB-T2 is a draft standard and is not yet beyond the first draft stage.

Regional switchovers are due to start properly in November 2008; it is unlikely that DVB-T2 receivers could be available by then, as the standard is not yet defined.

Some multiplex owners may have been expecting to benefit from the additional capacity created at switchover for their own services.

Also, the BBC has 7Mb/s taken from it for services it is already running, which using statistical multiplexing on BBC One will not compensate for.

For most people the DVB-T2 transmissions should not require a new aerial, but only those wanting the HDTV transmissions would need to get one.

In addition, most current MPEG4 services use more than the 10Mb/s allocated to the DVB-T system, such as on digital satellite where the BBC service is 16Mb/s, Sky Sports 1 HD is 18Mb/s, Sky Box Office HD is 19.5Mb/s and Discovery 16.4Mb/s. However, increasing computing power and technological advancement increase the compression ratio over time, perhaps supplying good quality HDTV at just 10Mb/s will be possible, as MPEG-2 compression ratios have improved over time.







The DVB-T2 specification requirements



  1. The DVB-T2 specification shall be designed for stationary reception. However, it shall be possible to design DVB-T2 networks for all three receiving conditions, fixed, portable and mobile.
  2. Transmissions using the DVB-T2 specification shall meet the interference levels and spectrum mask requirements as defined by GE06 and not cause more interference than DVB-T would do.
  3. The DVB-T2 specification should target the maximum increase in net payload capacity over DVB-T with similar or better robustness than DVB-T under similar conditions.
  4. The DVB-T2 specification shall provide a minimum increase in net payload capacity of 30% greater than DVB-T for any given channel profile under similar conditions.
  5. The characteristics of the DVB-T2 specification shall not impair the ability to perform, or efficiency of, statistical multiplexing of DTV Services.
  6. The DVB-T2 specification should offer improved robustness against interference from other transmitters, compared to DVB-T, potentially improving frequency reuse.
  7. The DVB-T2 specification shall offer a choice of various robustness and protection levels to be applied equally on all data of a transport stream carried by a DVB-T2 signal in a particular channel.
  8. The DVB-T2 specification should offer a choice of various robustness and protection levels for each service separately, within a transport stream carried by a DVB-T2 signal in a particular channel. When more than one transport stream is carried by a DVB-T2 signal in a particular channel the DVB-T2 specification should offer a choice of various robustness and protection levels for each transport stream separately.
  9. The DVB-T2 specification shall provide a quality of service across the whole channel that approximates to no more than one corrupted event (to any audio, video or data services) per hour for HDTV and SDTV services.
  10. Impulsive noise performance of DVB-T2 shall be no worse than the DVB-T performance and should be substantially improved from that of DVB-T.
  11. The DVB-T2 specification shall enable changes in modulation mode to be detected automatically within 0,5s. However, the receiver may not be capable of performing seamless changeover.
  12. The DVB-T2 specification shall not introduce any more than 0,3s of additional delay in receiver channel changing and service selection times compared to DVB-T.
  13. The DVB-T2 specification shall be able to provide at least the minimum specified increase in payload capacity over DVB-T using existing transmitter sites and masts broadcasting to existing DVB-T domestic antenna and cable installations.
  14. The DVB-T2 specification should be designed to allow lower cost transmitters (in terms of both capital and operational costs) than currently for DVB-T (for a given output power).
  15. The DVB-T2 specification should enable larger scale SFNs than currently possible with DVB-T. The maximum distance between adjacent transmitters in the same SFN should be at least 30% larger than that offered by a comparable DVB-T 8k mode for the same level of self-interference.
  16. The DVB-T2 specification should enable the development of cheap and regulationcompliant home gap fillers to ease indoor coverage, for fixed, portable and mobile services.
  17. The DVB-T2 specification shall provide for local, regional and national coverage areas in an economical way (i.e. optimising infrastructure costs and spectrum usage including SFN and/or MFN techniques) whilst also meeting spectrum management conditions and constraints as defined within the relevant international treaties and other agreements.
  18. Any changes to the Service Information delivery caused by DVB-T2 specification shall be incorporated in the common DVB SI specifications.
  19. The DVB-T2 specification shall support direct carriage of MPEG2 transport streams and shall be capable of carrying all DVB transports including MPEG2 and GSE.
  20. The DVB-T2 specification shall support the carriage of multiple DVB transports simultaneously on a single channel.
  21. The DVB-T2 specified signal shall be able to be received using existing DVB-T domestic antenna and cable installations.
<<  24-Oct-06 < Previous 24-Oct-06

Your comments are always welcome. Please use the form below to add your thoughts or questions to this page. We will get back to you as soon as we can.

I believe that only ~70% of the country have the ability to get cable? And absolutely no-one is interested in extending the cable network becos of the unrecoverable costs.
As Leftfield42 has stated the only group who could get it sorted are the Government but they won't commit the cash either.
Can't see BT upgrading old copper wire systems either as they are making no real money from their networks, so that just leaves us with Freeview or the Evil Empire!
One comment on Freeview boxes - I'm on my 3rd box in ~ 5years - can't see many (if any) people using the same box after 10 years!
Posted by Dave (8 posts) on Thursday 8 November 2007 8:02AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Dave: Cable passes much less than 70% of UK homes. Virgin Media own ALL of the cable licences in the UK, it is not possible for anyone else to add to them at the moment. BT will upgrade their copper wire systems, and have been doing for a large number of years now. Just because YOU havn't got fibre doesn't mean that it is not in use!
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Thursday 8 November 2007 9:19AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
How are Freeview viewers in SW Scotland to receive BBC1 & 2 (Scotland) and Radio Scotland under the above scheme?
My understanding was that an additional PSB1 mux would become available at digital switch over to allow both English & Scottish viewers to be served from Caldbeck transmitter.
Posted by Eric Muir (3 posts) on Thursday 8 November 2007 7:46PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Briantist,Don't disagree that BT are upgrading parts of the system - its just that the pace of replacement is of necessity (capital investment availability) slow!
As a non techie (as far as networks are concerned) it seems to me that they are trying to squeeze every last ounce out of the existing infrastructure - laudable but unlikely to allow HDTV to be transmitted to the masses.My exchange hasn't even got enough lines to make it worthwhile for ISPs to unbundle - so fibre??
As for cable - can't see Virgin ever building an economic case to extend the reach of their system (other than new City developments).
So - as I said - that leaves us(me!!) with either Freeview or the Dark Lord! (map)
Posted by Dave (8 posts) on Friday 9 November 2007 7:57AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Dave: Just because it's not going to happen in the next six month's doesn't mean it won't happen before 2017. Virgin, for example, can upgrade all their existing customers to 100Mb/s with almost no effort and certainly no new equipment at their customer's end. You can watch HDTV using a current broadband link - using downloads or BitTorrents!
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Friday 9 November 2007 11:56AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Eric Muir: I don't think it would make any difference, there would be duplicate PSB1, PSB2 and PSB3 multiplexes as with the current proposals.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Sunday 11 November 2007 10:36AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
So where is all the bandwidth freed up by the analogue switch off going then?

Straight into the governemts coffers as it hold the next humungus auction and then fritters away the proceeds to hide their own blunders in public spending I would guess.

It certainly seems from these proposals that they arn't recyling any of it into additional Freeview capacity or in upgrading all the Muxes to HD capbability!

Posted by Ian (1 post) on Thursday 15 November 2007 2:57PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Ian: You are correct, the money goes to the treasury. One minute the frequencies are for "public good" and the next for a goverment tax.


"I'll tell you what happens with impossible promises. You start with a far-fetched series of resolutions, and these are then pickled into a rigid dogma, a code, and you go through the years sticking to that, misplaced, outdated, irrelevant to the real needs, and you end in the grotesque chaos of a Labour government, a Labour government, hiring consultant to scuttle round the airwaves handing out payment notices to its own voters. I tell you - and you'll listen - you can't play politics with people's jobs and people's homes and people's services" (apologies to Neil Kinnock).
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Saturday 17 November 2007 6:56PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Well I dont give a dam anymore, All my freeview boxes have gone, and been replaced by Sky boxes with FTA cards, freeview is a joke
Posted by Iansilver (244 posts) on Wednesday 21 November 2007 5:12PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Ian: Perhaps not for long... 3 Freeview HD channels will start 2009 | ukfree.tv - first for the future of UK television
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Wednesday 21 November 2007 7:32PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Yes when everyone replaces the boxes and IDTV they have already purchased.
Posted by Iansilver (244 posts) on Wednesday 21 November 2007 10:20PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Ian: Yes, the boxes will have to be replaced. This is quite normal for computer equipment. The TV won't need replacing.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Thursday 22 November 2007 5:48AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Thats the whole point its not computer equipment its TV equipment, And if you have already got an IDTV because you didnt want extra boxes you are stuffed.
Posted by Iansilver (244 posts) on Thursday 22 November 2007 2:22PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Ian: I think you will find that the Freeview decoding is a computer function, hence "digital".
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Thursday 22 November 2007 6:49PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
the proces might be a computer function but most people do not regard TV as a computer function.
Posted by Iansilver (244 posts) on Thursday 22 November 2007 10:37PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Ian: The broacasters and Ofcom do, which is why the word "digital" is used.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Friday 23 November 2007 6:34AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
I think Leftfield should check his arithmetic. 69 to 85 is 16, not 26.
Posted by P.Woods (1 post) on Sunday 9 December 2007 9:32PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
OFCom HD TV and DVB-T2:-The closing date for comments (30/01/08) has now passed. As soon as a decision is reached, I'm sure all those contributors to this page would like to know the outcome. Please .... If anyone has information on what was decided we would ALL like to know what is happening.
Posted by Geoff. Dixonsilver (147 posts) on Saturday 2 February 2008 10:24PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Can anyone tell me how DVB t2 will affect TV analog mobile phones? If we sell TV mobile phones in America, should we now be selling DVB T or DVB T2 cell phones instead? Thanks
Posted by Emma (1 post) on Tuesday 25 March 2008 5:00PM CA
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Emma: The US uses ATSC for terrestrial broadcasts, not DVB-H. By 17 February 2009 - just under a year away - all the NTSC analogue services will be terminated in all states. "Analogue TV phones" will no longer work in the US after that date. There are some DVB-H (Handheld) networks starting, I don't think that ATSC is good for mobile reception... See also EU makes it time for Freeview Mobile? | ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice, since 2002
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Tuesday 25 March 2008 6:13PM xx
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Ofcom are desperate to find some way to defend the indefensible, namely their decision to hawk off the spectrum currently used by analogue telly to the highest bidder, rather than reallocating it for HD terrestrial TV broadcasts.

Such is their need to deflect criticism on this issue, they are trying to fit a quart into a pint pot, and I can't see how it's going to work - not without disappointing a lot of people who have rightly high expectations of the picture quality we were all promised digital TV - whether SD or HD - would bring. Over compressed, blocky, pixellated telly with artefacts all over it is not what we want.
Posted by Chris (3 posts) on Wednesday 26 March 2008 12:38PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Chris: Ofcom have been tasked to do the Digital Dividend Review by the government and HM Treasury. Not only does it stop HDTV being done terrestrially, but makes loads of money for the taxman.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Wednesday 26 March 2008 1:17PM xx
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
work has already started on transmitters.
some consumer products have sufferd and are now in a landfill,

no one has had a thought to the NIMO system that is alredy being planned to replace the DVB-T2 format in 2012.

Land fill is geting bigger?
Posted by Charles (1 post) on Tuesday 22 July 2008 1:00PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Charles: To be fair, a very small number of Freeview boxes are effected. DVB-T2 will start in 2009, and will only be used on a single multiplex. There are no plans to move any other multiplexes to DVB-T2 in 2012.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Tuesday 22 July 2008 1:32PM xx
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Please have a look at www.frequencycast.co.uk:80/freeviewlandfill.html

this i know is affecting LStv, and natuarly 1st gen, products.
Posted by Charles (1 post) on Tuesday 19 August 2008 11:07AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
Charles: This has been covered here under Problems with Sagem and TUTV Thompson PVRs | ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice, since 2002
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Tuesday 19 August 2008 12:11PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
I have a new Panasonic 32inch TV with Vivera latest technology etc and this week the reception of all the BBC programmes is very poor , what is going on? I live in East Yorkshire and have not had this problem before!My old TV worked OK but that was consigned to the scrap yard.
We are going backwards, will reception improve ? 28-05-2009
Posted by Paddy (1 post) on Thursday 28 May 2009 6:36AM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
I have a Sony Bravia TV which has built in Freeview, is there a company that can upgrade the freeview to freeview HD? Or is there a CAM card which can recieve Freeview HD that can be slotted in?

Much appreciated
JP
Posted by James Pereira (1 post) on Thursday 15 April 2010 1:37PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
James Pereira: You simply use a Freeview HD set-top box.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Thursday 15 April 2010 1:55PM GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
using the dvb-T2 standard to provide HD means throwing and landfilling tons of freeview boxes/ HD ready tv's already sold irrisponsibly, when they could have axed loads of the crap channels shopping channels/gambling channels/porn channels, that would have made enough space for some good HD ones on the old dvb-t standard, we could all have enjoyed without new purchases required, DVB-t2 adoption has slowed down freeview HD uptake imo, and if nimo is coming in 2012 it seems quite a sad affair the bbc HD content on sky has pushed the sales of sky boxes for the last 3 years, whilst we waited for freeview to get its act together.
Posted by d morgan (1 post) on Tuesday 27 July 2010 5:35AM, 1 days ago. xx
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
d morgan: "dvb-T2 standard to provide HD means throwing and landfilling tons of freeview boxes/ HD ready tv's"

That's not right. All the existing Freeview boxes continue to work, and there is no reason to trash a TV, as you just add a Freeview HD box to your HD Ready set.

" axed loads of the crap channels shopping channels/gambling channels/porn channels, that would have made enough space for some good HD ones"

No, that is simply incorrect. If you axed ALL of them, there still would be insufficient capacity for a single HD channel.

Also, there is no "they" to do that.

BBC HD (and the coming BBC One HD) and ITV HD are available on Freesat.
Posted by Briantistplatinum (21,369 posts) on Tuesday 27 July 2010 6:54AM, 1 days ago. GB
Please report anything you find offensive. Report this message
updates
Automatic update every 5 minutes
P1Page 2
Please post a question, answer or comment
  • Privacy policy: UK Free Privacy policy.